|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sunday |
Sep 9, 2007 |
Nadezhda Noginsk |
1 - 3 |
Zvezda 2005 Perm |
i |
| Sunday |
Sep 16, 2007 |
Chertanovo Moskva |
0 - 3 |
Izmailovo Moskva |
i |
| Sunday |
Sep 16, 2007 |
FC Khimki |
0 - 1 |
Nadezhda Noginsk |
i |
| Sunday |
Sep 16, 2007 |
Zvezda 2005 Perm |
1 - 0 |
Rossiyanka Mosk Oblast |
i |
| Sunday |
Sep 16, 2007 |
Ryazan VDV |
0 - 1 |
Avrora St Petersburg |
i |
| Saturday |
Sep 22, 2007 |
SKA Rostov na Donu |
1 - 1 |
Zvezda 2005 Perm |
i |
| Saturday |
Sep 22, 2007 |
Avrora St Petersburg |
3 - 0 |
Chertanovo Moskva |
i |
| Saturday |
Sep 22, 2007 |
Rossiyanka Mosk Oblast |
6 - 0 |
FC Khimki |
i |
| Monday |
Sep 24, 2007 |
Nadezhda Noginsk |
1 - 1 |
Ryazan VDV |
i |
| Friday |
Oct 5, 2007 |
Avrora St Petersburg |
1 - 3 |
FC Khimki |
i |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Team |
Overall |
|
|
Home |
|
|
Away |
| 1. |
(1) |
Zvezda 2005 Perm |
6 |
|
5 |
1 |
0 |
23 |
4 |
16 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
9 |
|
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
8 |
4 |
7 |
| 2. |
(2) |
Rossiyanka Mosk Oblast |
6 |
|
5 |
0 |
1 |
23 |
2 |
15 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
9 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
6 |
| 3. |
(4) |
FC Khimki |
6 |
|
4 |
0 |
2 |
12 |
10 |
12 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
3 |
6 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
7 |
6 |
| 4. |
(3) |
Nadezhda Noginsk |
6 |
|
3 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
8 |
1 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
9 |
| 5. |
(5) |
Izmailovo Moskva |
6 |
|
2 |
1 |
3 |
12 |
9 |
7 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
7 |
3 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
| 6. |
(6) |
Ryazan VDV |
6 |
|
2 |
1 |
3 |
9 |
11 |
7 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
8 |
4 |
| 7. |
(8) |
Avrora St Petersburg |
6 |
|
2 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
25 |
7 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
21 |
3 |
| 8. |
(7) |
SKA Rostov na Donu |
6 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
| 9. |
(9) |
Chertanovo Moskva |
6 |
|
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
|
Notice: The form of a club is derived from the 3 last home and 3 last away scores rather than directly from the 6 last scores in the league. This has been done so in order to erase the home advantage bias from the FORM, thus making the form more neutrally comparable.
|
Last update:August 28, 2008 17:54
|
|
|
|
|
|